![]() Taking 117 seconds to complete the workload meant it was 9% faster than the 5600X, despite being 26% slower than the 12600K. The Corona benchmark sees the 12400 delivering exceptional levels of performance, beating the 11600K and 5600X. Unfortunately, it doesn't fare nearly as well for the decompression test as the 12400 was only able to edge out the 10600K making it slower than the 11600K by a 12% margin and almost 30% slower than the 5600X. When compared to the 5600X it was 12% slower and 13% slower than the 12600K, though given the difference in price, that remains a good result for the locked Core i5 part. Moving on to 7-Zip, the 12400 is less impressive though it manages to slightly edge out the 11600K. Here we're looking at a 12% improvement in performance. The single core performance was also very mighty, and this of course explains how the 12400 beat the 5600X. Finally when compared to the 12600K, the 12400 was 30% slower and this is partly due to the 10% reduction in frequency along with the removal of the 4 E-cores and a 10% reduction in 元 cache capacity. Perhaps most impressive of all is the 9% margin it defeated the 5600X by, which doesn't bode particularly well for AMD. That being the case, it's incredible to see the base-spec 12400 beating the 11600K by an 8% margin and the 10600K by a massive 32%. Starting with the Cinebench R23 multi-core results, we find that the 12400 is good for just over 12,000 points, and when following the 65-watt spec, it was just 3% slower. That covers it, let's dive into the results. The plan was to do the same with the Intel 10th and 11th-gen Core processors, but performance went backwards in all instances with ReBAR enabled, so for now we've left this PCI Express feature disabled on those platforms.įinally, all application and gaming data has been collected using the Radeon RX 6900 XT graphics card and the operating system of choice was Windows 11. We've also updated the Ryzen data, using the MSI X570S Tomahawk Wi-Fi motherboard.Īll gaming data has been updated for the AM4 and LGA 1700 CPUs with Resizable BAR enabled. The K-SKU Alder Lake CPUs have been tested on the MSI Z690 Tomahawk Wi-Fi DDR4 using the same memory and all boards were updated to the latest BIOS revision. We haven't done any DDR5 testing for this one as it seems like a waste of time right now, and also we know all we need to in terms of DDR4 vs DDR5 performance (our big featured covered 41 games) or refer to our Core i9-12900K review which tested both types of memory and corresponding motherboards.įor testing the Core i5-12400, we're using the MSI B660M Mortar Wi-Fi DDR4 with 32GB of dual-rank, dual-channel DDR4-3200 CL14 memory - the same stuff we use for all our DDR4 testing - and it's typically faster than single-rank DDR4-3800 CL18 memory in terms of performance. Now, before we jump into the benchmarks, lets go over the test system specs. So it should be even faster than last generation's Core i5-11600K, which came in at $270 a year ago. What you're getting for around $200 is a 6 P-core, 12-thread Alder Lake CPU that operates up to 4.4 GHz with an 18 MB 元 cache and UHD 730 graphics. In most instances, particularly gaming, the 12400 shouldn't be a great deal slower than the 12600K, and if that is the case it's going to be an extremely sought-after item by budget gamers. That's 40% less than the 5600X, and 25% less than the rather unappealing 5600G. While you can expect to pay around $300 to the 12600K, which is the same price of AMD's Ryzen 5 5600X, the i5-12400 is just $210, with the F-SKU coming in at just $180. but what makes the i5-12400 so exciting is the price. And yet, in my opinion, this is one of the most exciting CPUs to be released in the last few years.Ĭompared to the Core i5-12600K, the four E-cores are gone, the 元 cache is reduced from 20 MB to 18 MB, the turbo clock speed has been wound down by 10%, and the base power has been slashed from 125 watts to just 65 watts. After all, it's mostly a heavily cut down 12600K, which we've already looked at. In reviewing the Core i5-12400, there's nothing on paper that tells you this could be an amazing CPU.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |